Thursday, 20 March 2014

There are myriad visions for a future filled with self-driving cars. For example, there’s Google’s experimental driverless car bristling with sensors, as well as more modest systems that would only take over from drivers for short periods. The problem with more ambitious self-driving car technologies is the considerably higher cost, whether in public infrastructure (networked roads) or the smarts built into the vehicles themselves. Volvo thinks it has an idea that could make self-driving cars work with much less hassle. All we need is a bunch of magnets embedded in the road.
Volvo began developing its magnet-based smart car system after looking long and hard at the other proposals on the table. It’s not just the cost of advanced sensors, cameras, GPS, and LIDAR that make self-driving cars tricky, the reliability is also questionable. Electronic solutions are more prone to failure in general, but even more so when inclement weather strikes. A magnet? Well, that’s always a magnet, and it can be paired with other automated technologies to make a fully driverless car.
In order to test the idea of using magnetic roadways, Volvo actually built a 100-meter test track in Hällered, Sweden and raced a specially modified S60 down it at over 90 mph. Engineers lined the road with neodymium magnets (20mm x 10mm) and ferrite magnets (30mm x 5mm) in lines down the edges and middle of the lane. The company tested both embedded and surface installation, finding that magnets on the surface would be effective and easier to install. Although, either option is sure to cause headaches in the case of roadwork.
Magnetic sensors are nothing new, but at the speeds we busy humans often need to drive, existing hardware wasn’t sensitive or fast enough. Volvo engineers calculated a car would require at least 400 magnetic samples per second to remain on the straight and narrow — a regular magnetic sensor can only do about three readings per second, and even then only when it is within a few centimeters of the magnet. So Volvo decided to roll its own magnetic sensor rig with five sensor modules, each with 15 smaller Honeywell magnetic sensor pods. This rig was attached to the bottom of the car and was able to pull in 500 readings per second.
The system was able to monitor the car’s location to within 10 cm at 45 mph when telemetry factors such as speed and acceleration were figured in. You’d probably want the precision to be a little higher before taking your hands off the wheel, but you get a lot for your money here. The advanced sensor package on Google’s self-driving car has about $150,000 worth of sensors, but Volvo estimates its magnetic sensor package will add only $109 to the cost of a car when produced in large quantities. Volvo also claims installing magnets in typical two-lane roadways would cost an average of $24,405 per kilometer. If that sounds like a lot, it’s not actually bad in the context of self-driving technology. Of course, you could only use this system where the magnets had been laid down — Google’s car works almost anywhere right now.
As the technology for self-driving cars becomes a reality, we need to ask ourselves how smart the cars should be. Expensive sensor packages are great for completely controlling a vehicle so you can take a nap, but only in good conditions. A bit of ice or some fog could make things awfully sketchy. If we rely on magnets in the road (or some other passive tech) everything is more reliable, but possibly not as convenient. A networked on-board systemcan respond to traffic dynamically and provide detailed analytics. Magnets — they just keep you on the road. However, it might end up being more important to focus on what’s feasible than what’s clever in the end. Magnets could end up as part of a more advanced system that at least has a basic fallback mode when things go wrong.
After an amazing three-year run, Apple announced today that it’s finally discontinuing the iPad 2. In its place, 2012′s fourth-generation iPad has returned to Apple’s line-up. With vastly superior internals, a retina display, and a lightning connector, the “iPad 4″ is a much better device than the iPad 2. Even better, it’s being sold at the exact same $399 price point.
In a PR statement released earlier today, Apple unceremoniously announced the death of the long-lived iPad 2. Apple’s second tablet was released back in March of 2011, and remained a core part of Apple’s line-up until today. With its A5 SoC, 1024×768 resolution, and 30-pin dock connector, the iPad 2 really was a relic from another time. Even after the introduction of the cheaper iPad Mini, Apple couldn’t bring itself to discontinue the iPad 2 for the longest time.

While it is slightly saddening to see the iPad 2 go, the fourth-generation iPad is a much better device. It sports Apple’s A6X SoC, twice the RAM of the iPad 2, and a lightning connector. Those are all nice improvements for the $399 asking price, but the addition of the Retina display is by far the biggest jump forward. Four times the number of pixels are being shoved into the same area, and that makes a huge difference for the end user. When it comes to reading text and watching movies, budget-minded consumers will now finally get the benefit of a full Retina display.
Unfortunately, this shake-up doesn’t rid Apple of its legacy technology completely. The original iPad Mini is still being manufactured, and it’s stuck with an ugly non-Retina display. Even worse, the iPhone 4S is still being sold with an old-fashioned dock connector and a 3.5-inch screen. Hopefully, this year’s tablet and smartphone refreshes will put the legacy connectors and screen resolutions behind us. Keeping multiple cables around is a huge hassle for consumers and retailers, and many developers are eagerly awaiting the day that non-Retina resolutions are no longer supported. The sooner Apple drops its legacy baggage, the better.

The fourth-generation iPad isn’t as powerful or as flashy as the $499 iPad Air, but this puts Apple in a better place to compete with the $379 8.9-inch Kindle Fire and the $399 10-inch Nexus 10. Consumers in the market for a big-screen tablet now have a bevy of high-quality options in the $400 price range. More than anything, this is evidence that Apple is completely willing to wage war with Amazon and Google for ultimate tablet dominance.
We’ve seen a handful ofsmartwatches launch in the last year, although none of them have sold in huge numbers. However, the idea is starting to gain some traction with a second generation of Samsung watches and a much more attractive Pebble. Now, Google is throwing its hat into the ring with Android Wear. This is a typically Google approach to a new market — rather than design its own singular device with narrow compatibility like Samsung, Android Wear is a platform for OEMs to innovate and build wearables using the best features of Android. For this reason, Android Wear might finally get smartwatches right.
Android Wear is still Android, but it’s not just a shrunken down version of the smartphone operating system like the original Galaxy Gear. Google’s new wearable platform relies on a subset of features that make sense on a smartwatch. Google Now cards are a big part of Wear, as is voice search.
Google is working with OEMs to get devices powered by Android Wear on the market this year, and there’s no single “right” form factor. Just like with Android phones, OEMs are free to experiment with square and round shapes, as well as a variety of hardware features and styles. Yes, round, like almost every normal watch. That alone might convince some folks to give smartwatches a shot.
http://www.extremetech.com/mobile/178702-the-best-shot-for-smartwatches-google-announces-android-wear
Add caption
We’ve all been there: Your computer’s 2-terabyte drive has filled itself up again, and it’s time to delete some movies and uninstall some games. But wait! Instead of deleting data like some kind of chump, I have a better idea: Build your own 180-terabyte RAID6 storage array, and never run out of space ever again. The best part? Building your own 180TB storage array will cost you just $9,305.
http://www.extremetech.com/computing/178757-how-to-build-your-own-180tb-raid6-storage-array-for-9305